Example of Philosophical Reflection

The philosophical reflection it is a mental action that can be clarified or reduced in giving the opinion of something that has already been studied or seen. It can be understood as a judgment made after the first thought or judgment.

Modern scholastics speak of the ontological reflection, defining it as the action of withdrawing or turning towards the known object.

Understanding directly what the word reflection etymologically describes, the concept of "re-flexion", can be understood as going back or a withdrawal of attention to what has already been seen.

It focuses on the psychological aspect of the human being, in which the object already studied and learned is can find another connotation by reviewing with more calm and concentration what has been done and done.

Example of philosophical reflection:

The good is not the same for each person, good and evil are not the same in all cultures, if in Western culture have Freedom is good and that everyone does what they want is good, it is absurd and obsolete in a region where the harsh climate or the economic or nutritional deficiency cause a closed attitude in which nobody can do what they want, they only focus on what indispensable.

Thus, forcing members of the family to remove snow is not a discriminatory act for the who are annoyed to do so, because in a given case it would be lethal not to comply with said homework.

Not so on the coast where in good times free time abounds, due to the good weather and the abundance of food, that regardless of the times of storms, where the obligations arise.

The concept of freedom is therefore always restricted to the circumstances and cultural perception of each area and not In no case should a nation demand Western-style freedom from a nation that requires a certain regime to be able to hold.

In this tenor of ideas, the minimum indispensable limitations change the parameter of freedom, making what seems good in one sense to turn out to be bad in another.

We can exemplify it in a mega nation that has problems in the winter, in order to stay alive they require large amounts of oil and obtaining this is a crucial part for their subsistence, and if in a given case a small nation has a lot of oil, it would seem good if not indispensable to subtract said material at the lowest cost, which is essential for their subsistence.

The line of good and bad is in this context on a razor's edge, since it would be cheaper and more convenient for the mega nation to acquire fuel oil by means of war than buying it directly, since their earnings and status would be greatly affected, becoming strong debtors and losing their hegemony.