Characteristics of Effective Leadership

The effective leadership It is a quality that every leader must contain, since being a leader is not the same as being a good leader and even less being an effective leader.

Effective leadership can have adverse appearances, but in the end the result is the expected or the best applicable one.

The characteristics of effective leadership they can be distinguished relatively easily, since they are decanted in hierarchical order.

It can be clarified with the father of the family, who can make decisions that the family members do not like, but generally they are for the benefit of all and selecting the best qualities of all those who intervene.

It implies a lot of responsibility to take the position of leader and despite the contradictions, the leaders who present achievable results and a good inclusion of team members, are recognized. An explanation would be the recognition of a good manager or boss, who would have certain qualities that cover the basic aspects that a leader must have to carry out effective leadership.

These might be:

• Intelligence
• Understanding
• Decision
• Integrity
• Impartiality
• Innovation
• Satisfaction.

All these qualities together, allow the leader to achieve effectiveness when carrying out his work, as he takes into account all the workers, accommodating them in the required position, understanding their personal problems and supporting them to carry out their work in the most neat possible.

Example of the use of effective leadership:

A manager is admitted to a production plant that decreased it for unjustified reasons.

When he started working, he began by visiting all the departments of the plant, and reviewed the circumstances by doing an internal audit.

Having the corresponding data, he interviewed each of the zone chiefs, who explained the productive situation to him in detail.

In the places where it was necessary, he personally rectified the circumstances and conflicts that might exist, leaving everything in sufficient working condition.

He changed the workers in the area, so that the natural quarrels that form in the workplace would not cause problems.

He emphatically reviewed the reports of incidents between workers and incidents due to various causes, to reach a sufficient conclusion about the circumstance of the plant in charge of him.

This manager, at the end of his work, was congratulated both by the shareholders' meeting and by the workers themselves, who They recognized that his efforts solved a wide margin of conflicts and inconsistencies within the production plant.