Example of Analog And Comparative Method

Humans are beings who tend to systematize tasks. No matter how disorganized or lazy we are, we will always make schemes in our heads to develop the daily tasks, however simple they may seem: from making the decision of what to eat for breakfast to its execution in the kitchen. This is because the brain is like a kind of computer that must handle information in parts. That is why it is very important that during learning, teachers and parents look for techniques to facilitate the acquisition of knowledge for minors.

The analogue method and the comparative method are the most frequently used during the first stage of learning. They are methods that will always seek to incite fundamental reasoning and awaken meaning. The analog and comparative method will go hand in hand most of the time because one leads to the other almost as if it were a definite sequence. While the analogical method is one that consists of assuming certain situations and the consequences that these situations will have Under certain imposed criteria, the comparative method is, then, the comparison between two similar situations but under different spotlights.

The implementation of the analog and comparative method

The implementation of both methods is a very useful type of reasoning because in addition to evaluating the consequences of a situation, allows evaluating the same decision from different points of view and under different thresholds that will lead to different consequences. However, it is risky because it is not always certain that these self-imposed situations can have exactly the planned result.

The An infallible starting point for such methods is the comparison of an event that has already occurred and known with a situation of its own, for example:

A teenager considers the possibility of not going to class. Then, under the focus of the analogical method, the adolescent knows in advance that he may have consequences for missing school. If they find out (focus the situation) they will call his parents and get into trouble. If they don't find out (he puts the same situation under another light) they won't tell his parents. Once the adolescent analyzed the consequences with the analogical method, he implemented the comparative method to make a decision: a classmate of his was discovered and did very badly. They punished him at school and his parents took his allowance. However, another classmate was not discovered but he missed the lesson that day and therefore did poorly on the exam. Using both methods, the analog and the comparison, the student has decided not to skip classes because he discovered that both ways could go wrong.

We can find examples of the implementation of the analogue method in popular sayings. Sayings are passed down from generation to generation and contain teachings that relate to everyday life. For example:

"Shrimp that falls asleep, it carries current". This saying invites us to reflect on the cases in which a person is not attentive to a certain event (cause) and, therefore, is led to an undesirable or uncomfortable situation (consequence). A person who, for example, is invited to participate in a work project but is undecided can use the method comparative and contrast his situation with the teaching of this saying: if he does not take advantage of the opportunity, perhaps in the future he will regret it.

The use of analogical and comparative methods in teaching

The method that teachers normally use to teach is analogical and comparative: they propose a real-life situation for students to ponder the implementation of the teachings in class and the apply. An example of this can be seen in the case of teaching addition and subtraction through hypothetical real-life situations in which a mathematical operation has to be applied. For example in the following problem: “Pepito had ten coins. He wanted an apple that cost four coins. If Pepito bought two apples, how many coins did he have left? Here, instead of using just cold numbers, addition, multiplication, and subtraction as equations, teachers encourage students to see that such operations will be useful in real life.

The everyday use of analog and comparative methods

It would seem only child's play, but these methods are indispensable in human reasoning. What distinguishes a human being from an animal is the way he processes information and the usefulness he will give it. On a daily basis we face situations in which we have to make a decision: how to solve a problem? inconvenient?, what to do when faced with a problem?, will it be harmful or beneficial for us to do a stop doing it? The implementation of the analog and comparative method is an effective tool that can help us face and solve these daily problems.

15 examples of the analogical and comparative method in sayings

Some sayings provide teachings through the analogical method (state a situation and the consequences it will have). Someone who is faced with a similar situation will use, from the teaching of this saying, the comparative method to contrast your situation with that of the proverb and with other similar situations that know.

1. Water that you should not drink, let it run. This saying invites us to reflect on the consequences (analogical method) of a person getting involved in a matter that does not correspond to him or in which he has no responsibility.
2. You are the master of what you keep quiet and the slave of what you say. This saying teaches, through the analogical method, that you have to be careful with what you say because it will have consequences.
3. By the mouth dies the fish. This saying is similar to the previous one: it shows that something that is said (cause) can cause an unfavorable situation (consequence).
4. Everything fits in a jar knowing how to accommodate it. This saying implies that when things are organized (cause) good results are obtained (consequence).
5. As much guilt is the one who kills the cow as the one who grabs the leg. This saying invites us to reflect on the consequences of being part of a negative fact.
6. If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. This saying instructs about taking advantage of opportunities or situations that arise (cause) to get the most out of them (consequence).
7. There is no evil that lasts a hundred years or a body that resists it. This saying invites you to meditate regarding the confrontation of adverse situations; to do something (cause) to get out of these situations (consequence).
8. Loose lips sink ships. This saying teaches that if something wrong is said (cause) it will cause a harmful situation (consequence).
9. The early bird God helps. This saying shows that if a person strives (cause) he achieves his goals (consequence).
10. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. This saying makes you think about taking advantage of opportunities or what is at hand. It is better to have something safe (cause) than to cover many things and that none of them work (consequence).
11. When you see your neighbor's beard cut, put yours to soak. This saying teaches that when you see something happen to someone, be aware that it can also happen to you (comparative method).
12. By spoiling you learn. This saying invites you to reflect that when you want to learn something (consequence) you should practice it even if it turns out badly at first (cause).
13. Better bad for known than good for knowing. This saying teaches that it is not convenient to risk something that you do not know (cause) since the unknown can bring negative consequences.
14. Better late than never. This saying makes us reflect on the situations in which a person does not want to do something because he thinks that he is no longer on time; it is better to do things and get results (consequence) than not to do them and get nothing (consequence).
15. To the misstep hurry. This saying shows that when there is a difficulty (cause) you do not have to wait, but you have to do everything possible to get out of it quickly (consequence).

Examples of the analog and comparative method

Example 1. A child wonders whether or not he should tell his parents that he broke a lamp.

• Analog method. The child evaluates the situation from different perspectives: if he tells them, they may scold him; If he doesn't tell them, they may not blame him.
• Comparative method. The boy evaluates his situation by comparing it with others: a friend of his who said that he had broken a window was discovered and punished; Another friend did not want to say that he had broken a device and anyway his parents discovered him and punished him more for having lied.

Example 2. A student wants to choose between two different college majors.

• Analog method. The student evaluates the benefits and consequences of studying each of the careers.
• Comparative method. The student compares her situation with that of other friends and acquaintances who have studied each of the two careers: how did it go, what do they think of the career, etc.

Example 3. A teacher uses the analog and comparative method to teach how to divide.

• Analog method. The teacher asks the students to solve this problem so that they understand in what kind of situations they can Divisions be useful: “If I won 100 pesos and I want to divide it among my four brothers, how much will each of us have? one?".
• Comparative method. The teacher asks the students to write in which situations in their life the divisions can be useful. Students compare the problem situation with those they face in their daily lives.

Example 4. A teacher uses the comparative analog method to teach his students how to start a business.

• Analog method. The teacher asks the students to write what are the steps that have to be done to create a business, what is the importance of each of these steps and what impact it has on the business.
• Comparative method. The teacher asks the students to evaluate in which situations they have had to negotiate and how they resolved it; Also, have them write a list of businesses they know, what they do and how they work.

Example 5. A doctor must make an urgent decision to save the life of one of his patients.

• Analog method. The doctor evaluates the benefits and consequences of each of the options that he has, the pros and cons and how they could cure, improve, affect or put the patient at risk.
• Comparative method. To make the decision, the doctor compares the patient's situation with other similar cases that he himself or one of his colleagues has faced. Also, he compares this situation with the medical cases that he learned in medical school and the cases that he has read in different medical books.

Example 6. An investor does not know where he will invest his money or whether he should invest it or not.

• Analog method. The investor analyzes the consequences of investing his money: if things go wrong, he will lose his money; If they go well, you will make more money from the money invested.
• Comparative method. The investor compares his investment options with those of his acquaintances. Evaluate their situations to decide which option has less risk and has been more fruitful in the long run.

Example 7. A person wants to know if he should change jobs.

• Analog method. The worker contemplates the positive and negative consequences of leaving his job and the positive and negative consequences of accepting the other job.
• Comparative method. The worker investigates the company that offered him a job: how serious it is, how long it has been in the market, what new challenges it implies, etc. It also evaluates the employment situation of the people who work in said company.