Definition of Parliamentary Regime

Process in which the election of the Executive Power of a nation is in charge of the Legislative Power

The concept that concerns us below belongs to and is handled in a excluding in the field of politics where designates that process in which the choice of executive power of a nation is in charge of Parliament, which is the same as saying legislative power. That is, the legislative branch elects the executive branch.

The executive branch and the legislative branch have a close relationship in which the confidence of the latter commands the success of the former

Then and unlike presidential systems where the figure and authority The president is exclusive, this being the head of state and government, in the case of the Parliamentary Regime, mostly present in monarchies parliamentarians, the executive power and the legislative power have a close relationship of power, that is, both are needed for governance to exist, because without the confidence and support of the parliament the government in office cannot govern with tranquility. This situation does not happen in presidential democratic systems, where each power is independent of the other and there is no link as expressed in this case.

Premier, Chancellor, Prime Minister, main ways of calling who exercises the executive in these systems

In this type of system, then, the Parliament elects an individual enrolled in a party or an alliance of parties and is usually given the following titles depending on the custom of the Nation: Premier (Italy), Chancellor (Germany), Prime Minister (in Canada), among others. Meanwhile, the head of government will be embodied by the individual elected by Parliament and will be the one who takes care of executive functions, while the head of state will be the monarch if it is a monarchy parliamentary.

The people elect the parliamentary representatives and they elect the executive representative

Now, in this type of regimes the participation of the people will be fundamental in terms of the election of those who will make up the Parliament and that those representatives chosen by the citizen will then have the mission of electing the First Minister. In presidential systems, the people directly elect who they want to carry out the executive function.

Transparency and consensus, his strengths, according to his defenders

Those who strongly defend this regime maintain that transparency and consensus are its fundamental bases, because as there is a varied representation of politicians the Decisions will always be the result of a high consensus and, furthermore, as the head of government has to answer to Parliament for his actions, his actions will be more controlled and bounded. One of the great problems attributed to the presidential system is the excessive valuation that is gives the presidential figure that many times leads to a strong personalism that ends up affecting the democracy.

It should be noted that this mechanism is also called parliamentarism.