Definition of Logical Reasoning

Logic is an auxiliary science. This means that it provides useful knowledge to the rest of the disciplines and to knowledge in general.

Logic provides a formal structure that is part of the mental processes of understanding. The formal structure of logic is formed from a series of laws, rules and logical principles, which are considered valid and without which the thought rational doesn't make sense. As for the rules of logic, the best known are the following: law from identity, law of non-contradiction, the law of the excluded environment, rules of inference or the principle of sufficient reason. These rules and others allow us to argue with logical reasoning. In other words, for ideas to have coherence and a certain order, it is essential that an argument is based on logical reasoning.

Logical reasoning in law

In the sphere of Right the laws are the framework by which an order is established that regulates social activity. These laws are used by judges, lawyers, as well as by all actors involved in any legal activity. For the arguments used to be consistent and valid, they must be governed by logical reasoning.

Bases of the legal structure

It is possible to speak of logical reasoning in the field of law when the fundamental principles of law are respected. On the other hand, there are a series of technical elements that are part of legal logical reasoning: construction of hypothesis, statement of a problem, the internal consistency of data or evidence, the cause-effect relationship, etc. And all this, using a deductive analysis (which goes from the general to the particular) or inductive (starting with specific data until a generalization is obtained).

Thus, a logical reasoning in law is one that serves to argue ideas for some purpose (a judge to pass a sentence or a lawyer to defend his client).

A significant example

To illustrate the concept of logical reasoning, it is worth presenting a simple example, specifically of logical reasoning based on the inductive method. There is an observer who notes that one ant is black and then observes that other ants have the same color. Finally, take out the conclusion that all ants are black. In this case, the idea stated in the conclusion is based on each of the specific observations made. This logical reasoning is valid but if an ant of a different color appeared, it would cease to be.

In conclusion, any idea, argument, debate or analysis has an internal aspect that cannot be avoided: logical reasoning.